![]() ![]() |
Feb 27 2008, 02:26 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Talkin' the talk since 2003 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 28,271 Joined: 27-August 03 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 27 Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T |
This poll is made up of all DSTOTY vehicles that got with 75% of the top vote without winning in their category. This thread will close in one week.
For more on the DieselStation Car of the Year '08 competition, please see this thread. Ford Taurus X Base MSRP: $26,615 Available Engines: 3.5 liter DOHC 24-valve V6 with 263 HP and 249 ft.-lbs. of torque. Available Transmissions: 6-speed automatic transmission Available Drivetrains: Front wheel drive or All-wheel drive EPA Fuel Economy: 16 City/24 Highway (FWD), 15/22 (AWD) Curb Weight: 3959-4112 lbs. ![]() ![]() ![]() Toyota Highlander Base MSRP: $27,300 Available Engines: 3.5 liter DOHC 24-valve V6 with 270 HP and 248 ft.-lbs. of torque; 3.3 liter DOHC 24-valve V6 with hybrid system and 209 HP and 212 ft.-lbs. of torque. Available Transmissions: 5-speed automatic with manual shifting mode (3.5 only) or CVT (Hybrid only) Available Drivetrains: Front wheel drive (3.5 only) or All-wheel drive EPA Fuel Economy: 27 City/25 Highway (Hybrid), 18/24 (FWD), 17/23 (3.5 AWD) Curb Weight: 3979-4641 lbs. ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 02:36 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Posting God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 11,366 Joined: 30-January 05 From: Dubai Member No.: 1,451 |
I originally voted for the Taurus X, so I'm not going to change that here. Though I admit the Highlander looks great, and that interior is probably pretty high quality stuff.
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 02:38 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Talkin' the talk since 2003 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 28,271 Joined: 27-August 03 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 27 Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T |
I went for the Highlander because it looks so nice and is probably technically superior, but I readily acknowledge that the Ford is a very nice package.
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 07:34 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Banana ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 534 Joined: 14-November 07 From: Montreal Member No.: 4,139 Car: '12 STI (blue) |
Even if the Taurus X's pictures look better, I voted for the Highlander. My father owns one of them and it's really good looking, and it does a good job in the snow.
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 07:52 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Race Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,455 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 2,585 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 10:03 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Race Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,587 Joined: 2-October 07 From: Canada Member No.: 4,080 Car: 2009 Subaru Legacy |
I heard a rumour that the Taurus X was getting the axe. Which kinda makes sense, considering you have the Escape and Edge in addition to the Taurus X.
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 12:17 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Posting God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 11,366 Joined: 30-January 05 From: Dubai Member No.: 1,451 |
2009 will be its final year of production. The Taurus X has always been more of a raised wagon than a proper SUV. Kind of like Ford's version of the Allroad or Outback. Hence the rename from Freestyle to Taurus X. Like most wagons in the US, sales figures have been pretty dismal, and with the Edge doing so well, it only makes sense to pull the plug. Also, I believe there's a new Taurus on the way around the time this gets the axe, and a wagon isn't part of the plan.
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 01:21 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Talkin' the talk since 2003 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 28,271 Joined: 27-August 03 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 27 Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T |
Wait what pictures did I pick that look bad? The Taurus X is nigh impossible to find good pictures of and I like the ones I picked for the Highlander...
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 02:08 PM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Posting God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 11,366 Joined: 30-January 05 From: Dubai Member No.: 1,451 |
Yeah those are actually the best shots I've seen for the Taurus X.
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 02:12 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Talkin' the talk since 2003 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 28,271 Joined: 27-August 03 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 27 Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T |
Those were just from the Ford website.
All the pictures in DSCOTY are 640 pixels wide. I tried to find high-quality pictures to crop and resize them from (1280x1024 was the most typical size I found, but some were as big as 3600x2400). However, the Taurus X...the biggest pictures I could find were the 750 pixel ones on the Ford website. So that's what those are. |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2008, 06:11 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Banana ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 534 Joined: 14-November 07 From: Montreal Member No.: 4,139 Car: '12 STI (blue) |
What I said is the pictures of the Taurus X are good, and the ones of the Highlander aren't as good, and in my opinion the vehicle with the worst pictures is the best vehicle between the two.
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 05:29 AM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Race Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,587 Joined: 2-October 07 From: Canada Member No.: 4,080 Car: 2009 Subaru Legacy |
2009 will be its final year of production. The Taurus X has always been more of a raised wagon than a proper SUV. Kind of like Ford's version of the Allroad or Outback. Hence the rename from Freestyle to Taurus X. Like most wagons in the US, sales figures have been pretty dismal, and with the Edge doing so well, it only makes sense to pull the plug. Also, I believe there's a new Taurus on the way around the time this gets the axe, and a wagon isn't part of the plan. I don't think I understand that grey area which separates the tall wagon from SUVs...but there seems to me to be a massive difference between something like the Allroad and the TaurusX. As far as I was concerned the re-branding of the Freestyle to TaurusX was a half-assed marketing effort related to poor sales and the re-branding of the five hundred. |
|
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 06:32 AM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Posting God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 11,366 Joined: 30-January 05 From: Dubai Member No.: 1,451 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 09:12 AM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Pit Mechanic ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,304 Joined: 21-November 03 Member No.: 192 |
Taurus by miiiiles.
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 05:45 PM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Race Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,455 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 2,585 |
Haha, it's not that they're terrible they're just boring in comparison to the Taurus's, giving the Taurus the competitive edge.
![]() ![]() ![]() I still really appreciate you putting this together every year. |
|
|
|
Feb 28 2008, 10:06 PM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Talkin' the talk since 2003 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 28,271 Joined: 27-August 03 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 27 Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T |
Well personal pref...I prefer my pictures to yours. Whatever.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th June 2026 - 04:06 AM |