Full Version: Legal battle threatens British GP
This has to be one of the best threads made by someone with <10 posts.
It sounds like DVLL is guilty but someone speculated near the end that they might not owe them anyway.
I have to say, I'm impressed with them taking out a 1.5 century long lease. That's something that you don't see everyday. Most companies/ventures don't make it to 100 years....
It sounds like DVLL is guilty but someone speculated near the end that they might not owe them anyway.
I have to say, I'm impressed with them taking out a 1.5 century long lease. That's something that you don't see everyday. Most companies/ventures don't make it to 100 years....
When I first read about the switch to Donington and about the money Gillett wanted to invest I immediately knew this wasn't going to work. Even though I didn't expect the whole thing to crash so soon.
There's another thread about Donington, btw.
There's another thread about Donington, btw.
QUOTE(Aircooled @ Apr 23 2009, 08:12 PM) 
This has to be one of the best threads made by someone with <10 posts.
well im every so sorry .. im always visiting but not really been bothered to post a great deal ... but do love visiting ... if i get sarcastic remarks i wont bother posting or visit again
I don't think he was being sarcastic.
You were in the F1 competition for a while last year weren't you? Don't fancy playing this year?
You were in the F1 competition for a while last year weren't you? Don't fancy playing this year?
QUOTE(tune @ Apr 24 2009, 10:14 AM)
You were in the F1 competition for a while last year weren't you? Don't fancy playing this year?
yes i was but been very busy of late with work .. and yet another sprog on the way time is short :(
QUOTE(Neotax @ Apr 24 2009, 05:04 AM)
well im every so sorry .. im always visiting but not really been bothered to post a great deal ... but do love visiting ... if i get sarcastic remarks i wont bother posting or visit again
Sure, ok.
It's not like you're part of the community anyway. After all, you only just have 10 posts as of this sarcastic and snarky reply.
Is it any wonder?
I was serious, good post.
QUOTE(Phix @ Apr 24 2009, 01:11 PM)
Sure, ok.
It's not like you're part of the community anyway. After all, you only just have 10 posts as of this sarcastic and snarky reply.
It's not like you're part of the community anyway. After all, you only just have 10 posts as of this sarcastic and snarky reply.
well with comments like yours that have drivern so many people aways .. ive seen happen so many times .. makes you wounder why some people dont want to be part of the community... when people just pick on things
also when people stand up for there self .. u normally end up banning them .. so this is most prob's my last post
anyways goin off topic
QUOTE
I would very strongly argue that the most efficient way of retaining the Grand Prix is to look at the current infrastructure we have in place, which is Silverstone - that's a perfectly suitable venue as we stand today
Damon Hill
Damon Hill
they shouldnt of left sliverstone in the first place
QUOTE(Aircooled @ Apr 24 2009, 07:22 PM)
I was serious, good post.
im sorry if i miss understood by what u meant
Doesn't Damon Hill have a bit of a vested interest in seeing the GP return to Sliverstone? I though that the BRDC, which DH is the prez of, is responsible for running Silverstone, and took a huge hit when F1 left.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.