Dr. Strangelove
Apr 20 2006, 10:27 AM
I mentioned earlier that the 360 is the loosers Ferrari, but I was wrong, here it is:


215 HP for early models and 240 HP for later ones. Top speed 155MPH. 0-60 7.4 seconds. And the cheapest Ferrari you can buy today.
trail_boss2
Apr 20 2006, 10:30 AM
delete your old thread
and i chose mj uncool, id rather drive a civic
PBB
Apr 20 2006, 10:58 AM
DakianDelomast
Apr 20 2006, 11:45 AM
Actually you know what? I'm leaning towards cool on this one.
PAULIE_D
Apr 20 2006, 11:52 AM
It's certainly not the greatest looking Ferrari vbt the late models had a very good engine and had very respectable performance. In it's final years, it's performance was on par with the 348.
Clickman
Apr 20 2006, 12:11 PM
I like the gated shifter..
leif
Apr 20 2006, 03:26 PM
Mid engined 4 seater...on those credientials alone I would have to go with uncool...but being a Ferrari, makes this something kinda weird...I could Imagine only two kinds of people buying one of these...those desperate to own a ferrari and like the low asking price...or someone with enough self esteme to be seen in a ferrari grocery getter.
so its kinda cool.
BurningSky
Apr 21 2006, 04:12 AM
I say cool. As long as you have an Enzo in your garage as well.
DakianDelomast
Apr 21 2006, 09:02 AM
QUOTE(BurningSky @ Apr 21 2006, 08:12 AM)

I say cool. As long as you have an Enzo in your garage as well.

0.o
BankieVR6
Apr 21 2006, 11:53 AM
the wheel wells are far too large for those 15"s or whatever on there. throw on some 18's and the side of the car might actually make some sense.
BurningSky
Apr 21 2006, 09:09 PM
QUOTE(DakianDelomast @ Apr 21 2006, 01:02 PM)

0.o
Haha, what's that supposed to mean?
Boxster17
Apr 21 2006, 09:17 PM
I just think it looks stupid, especially that side profile...it's just goofy looking. I gave it an MJ Uncool, although there also aren't many Ferrari's that I actually like.
infinity
Apr 21 2006, 09:35 PM
It's pretty effin' sweet if you ask me...I'm a big fan of the Cavallino and although its not the most sporty or aggressive looking Ferrari by any means, it's still unique and attractive. I agree that some slightly larger wheels (like 17s or 18s) would improve the overall appearance, but still for it's age, it's pretty sweet i'd say.
Dr. Strangelove
Apr 21 2006, 11:55 PM
Can we at least agree that this is the lamest Ferrari?
moe
Apr 22 2006, 06:51 AM
It's still a Ferrari, I'd take one in a heartbeat. And at least it looks better than the Enzo.
moe
Apr 22 2006, 06:56 AM
Boxster17
Apr 22 2006, 07:16 AM
Somehow I still think the one this thread is about looks worst than the one you posted above here.
moe
Apr 22 2006, 10:16 AM
QUOTE(Boxster17 @ Apr 22 2006, 06:16 PM)

Somehow I still think the one this thread is about looks worst than the one you posted above here.
I actually like the Mondial for some reason, like I wouldn't mind owning one at all. However the 400...ugh...I can't believe they put a prancing horse on it...then again I also hate the Enzo.
imisplacedmine
Apr 22 2006, 11:39 PM
The Mondial has always been, and will always be, the car that tops my list for "ugliest Ferrari's."
Cyclone
May 3 2006, 12:17 AM
I've always really liked these. And Miles Davis is the shit, so its Miles Davis cool
salvation
May 3 2006, 02:23 AM
It looks like a kit car, the proportions seem wrong.
A 4 seater mid engined car is a nifty idea but poor execution makes this one get an uncool vote from me.
The ugliest Ferrari ever is the Enzo.
salvation
May 3 2006, 05:57 AM
QUOTE(moethepaki @ May 3 2006, 01:32 PM)

The ugliest Ferrari ever is the Enzo.
Yes you have mentioned that, Im not too keen on cars which have been designed with a ruler.(although some 70's wedges are ok)
I'm sure that the form has been defined by the function or something like that.
But does not stop the Mondial being uncool.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.