Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Closed TopicStart new topic
> DSCOTY '08: Family Sedans
DSCOTY '08: Family Sedans
What is Dieselstation's Family Sedan of the year?
Chevrolet Malibu [ 11 ] ** [22.92%]
Dodge Avenger [ 1 ] ** [2.08%]
Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable [ 4 ] ** [8.33%]
Honda Accord Sedan [ 29 ] ** [60.42%]
Saturn Aura Green Line [ 3 ] ** [6.25%]
Total Votes: 48
  
clarkma5
post Feb 6 2008, 08:10 PM
Post #1


Talkin' the talk since 2003
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 28,271
Joined: 27-August 03
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 27
Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T



For more on the DieselStation Car of the Year '08 competition, please see this thread.

Chevrolet Malibu
Base MSRP:
$19,995
Available Engines: 2.4 liter DOHC 16-valve inline-4 with 169 HP and 160 ft.-lbs. of torque, 3.6 liter DOHC 24-valve V6 with 252 HP and 251 ft.-lbs. of torque, 2.4 liter DOHC 16-valve inline-4 with Hybrid system with 164 HP and 159 ft.-lbs. of torque.
Available Transmissions: 4-speed automatic (2.4 and Hybrid only) or 6-speed automatic transmission with manual shifting mode (V6 only)
Available Drivetrains: Front wheel drive
EPA Fuel Economy: 24 City/32 Highway (Hybrid), 22/30 (2.4), 17/26 (3.6)
Curb Weight: 3415-3649 lbs.







Dodge Avenger
Base MSRP:
$19,265
Available Engines: 2.4 liter DOHC 16-valve inline-4 with 173 HP and 166 ft.-lbs. of torque, 2.7 liter DOHC 24-valve V6 with 186 HP and 191 ft.-lbs. of torque, 3.5 liter SOHC 24-valve V6 with 235 HP and 232 ft.-lbs. of torque.
Available Transmissions: 4-speed automatic transmission (2.4 & 2.7 only) or 6-speed automatic transmission with manual shifting mode (3.5 only)
Available Drivetrains: Front wheel drive or All-wheel drive (R/T model only)
EPA Fuel Economy: 21 City/30 Highway (2.4), 19/27 (2.7), 16/26 (3.5 FWD), 15/24 (3.5 AWD)
Curb Weight: 3355-3738 lbs.







Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable
Base MSRP:
$23,485 (Taurus), $23,780 (Sable)
Available Engines: 3.5 liter DOHC 24-valve V6 with 263 HP and 249 ft.-lbs. of torque.
Available Transmissions: 6-speed automatic transmission
Available Drivetrains: Front wheel drive or All-wheel drive
EPA Fuel Economy: 18 City/28 Highway (FWD), 17/24 (AWD)
Curb Weight: 3643-3820 lbs.







Honda Accord Sedan
Base MSRP:
$20,360
Available Engines: 2.4 liter DOHC 16-valve inline-4 with 177 HP and 161 ft.-lbs. of torque (190/162 in EX models), 3.5 liter SOHC 24-valve V6 with Variable Cylinder Management and 268 HP and 248 ft.-lbs. of torque.
Available Transmissions: 5-speed manual (N/A on V6) or 5-speed automatic transmission (standard on V6)
Available Drivetrains: Front wheel drive
EPA Fuel Economy: 22 City/31 Highway (2.4 5MT), 21/31 (2.4 5AT), 19/29 (V6)
Curb Weight: 3230-3600 lbs.







Saturn Aura Green Line
Base MSRP:
$22,790
Available Engines: 2.4 liter DOHC 16-valve inline-4 with Hybrid system with 164 HP and 159 ft.-lbs. of torque.
Available Transmissions: 4-speed automatic
Available Drivetrains: Front wheel drive
EPA Fuel Economy: 24 City/32 Highway
Curb Weight: 3529 lbs.





Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moe
post Feb 7 2008, 01:37 AM
Post #2


Posting God
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,365
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451
Car: '13 Toyota 86



I voted for the Accord. Though its awful looking interior almost made me vote for the Malibu.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
clarkma5
post Feb 7 2008, 01:42 AM
Post #3


Talkin' the talk since 2003
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 28,271
Joined: 27-August 03
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 27
Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T



QUOTE(moethepaki @ Feb 7 2008, 01:37 AM) *
I voted for the Accord. Though it's awful looking interior almost made me vote for the Malibu.



I went for the Malibu. The Accord is a little bit superior, but it will soon be uniquitous and the Malibu really does look way better inside and out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moe
post Feb 7 2008, 01:43 AM
Post #4


Posting God
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,365
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451
Car: '13 Toyota 86



QUOTE(clarkma5 @ Feb 7 2008, 01:42 PM) *
The Accord is a little bit superior, but it will soon be uniquitous and the Malibu really does look way better inside and out.


Inside, I'll agree. Outside is debatable. I think the Malibu looks awkward from some angles, and though the Accord is a bit blah, it's still a very handsome looking car.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
clarkma5
post Feb 7 2008, 02:10 AM
Post #5


Talkin' the talk since 2003
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 28,271
Joined: 27-August 03
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 27
Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T



Ugh I find the Accord just revolting.

Also, I applaud whoever voted for the Taurus/Sable. I do like the improvements that have been made to those cars.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moe
post Feb 7 2008, 02:16 AM
Post #6


Posting God
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,365
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451
Car: '13 Toyota 86



QUOTE(clarkma5 @ Feb 7 2008, 02:10 PM) *
Also, I applaud whoever voted for the Taurus/Sable. I do like the improvements that have been made to those cars.


Agreed, they're a very stylish pair of cars.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn
post Feb 7 2008, 03:31 AM
Post #7


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,587
Joined: 2-October 07
From: Canada
Member No.: 4,080
Car: 2009 Subaru Legacy



Had to vote for the Aura...everything else was either hideous on the outside, or hideous on the inside...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pollard
post Feb 7 2008, 08:21 AM
Post #8


Shift Noob
*

Group: Members
Posts: 88
Joined: 21-November 06
From: Arkansas
Member No.: 3,417
Car: 06 Fusion



voted Malibu looks better inside than accord
do not care for the others
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn
post Feb 7 2008, 09:13 AM
Post #9


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,587
Joined: 2-October 07
From: Canada
Member No.: 4,080
Car: 2009 Subaru Legacy



Just outta curiosity, is the Aura Greenline considered a hybrid? I know it has that system where is shuts down the engine on deceleration and while idling, but it doesn't have an electric motor...so would the state of California let you go in the car pool lane in one of these alone?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
clarkma5
post Feb 7 2008, 09:15 AM
Post #10


Talkin' the talk since 2003
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 28,271
Joined: 27-August 03
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 27
Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T



QUOTE(Bjorn @ Feb 7 2008, 09:13 AM) *
Just outta curiosity, is the Aura Greenline considered a hybrid? I know it has that system where is shuts down the engine on deceleration and while idling, but it doesn't have an electric motor...so would the state of California let you go in the car pool lane in one of these alone?


No, I think you have it backward. It doesn't shut down the engine under circumstances where a lot of other hybrids would (since it's a series system and not a parallel system) but it does have an electric motor.

And the california car pool thing was only open to vehicles with a combined EPA mileage in excess of some value (I think it was 45 MPG) and there were only 70,000 stickers for it. Thus the only cars eligible for that were the Civic Hybrid and the Prius and the stickers ran out in mid-2006 anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
UserDrew
post Feb 7 2008, 11:50 AM
Post #11


Latent racecar driver
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,337
Joined: 31-January 05
From: So-Cal
Member No.: 1,455
Car: 2006 Slobalt, '65 Karmann Ghia



Ford Execs hate the Taurus.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synesthesia
post Feb 7 2008, 01:15 PM
Post #12


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,455
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 2,585



QUOTE(moethepaki @ Feb 7 2008, 05:16 AM) *
Agreed, they're a very stylish pair of cars.


Are you kidding? I can see your argument about the exterior, but that interior looks soooo outdated!

I voted for the Accord. While not the gorgeous, I think it's looks are interesting at least and it'll be the best car for a family in the long run.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moe
post Feb 7 2008, 02:35 PM
Post #13


Posting God
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,365
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451
Car: '13 Toyota 86



QUOTE(Synesthesia @ Feb 8 2008, 01:15 AM) *
Are you kidding? I can see your argument about the exterior, but that interior looks soooo outdated!


What's to kid about, you saw the argument.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Razor
post Feb 7 2008, 02:59 PM
Post #14


IT SLIDES!
*****

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,345
Joined: 5-February 07
From: Maine
Member No.: 3,670
Car: Volkswagen R32 Mk V



IMO the Accord is the coolest car here, winning barely over the Malibu.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dukenukem
post Feb 7 2008, 03:11 PM
Post #15


**Snuggles**
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,251
Joined: 13-November 03
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 166
Car: 2006 Subaru WRX STI



Accord is still the best FAMILY car here. Others have gotten better but none are as good as the Accord.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
UserDrew
post Feb 7 2008, 10:30 PM
Post #16


Latent racecar driver
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,337
Joined: 31-January 05
From: So-Cal
Member No.: 1,455
Car: 2006 Slobalt, '65 Karmann Ghia



I voted for the Aurora. A friend of mine drives a Four banger Aura. I told him to avoid the 6. 3.5 and only 215hp is pretty weak. The interior is made of slightly better quality plastics than my Cobalt and the lighting feels a little more calming. I can't tell you anything more useful becuase I haven't driven it. It was the car I voted for.

I don't like the design of the new Accord. I feel differently about the Coupe however. The new Malibu is nice. Some WASPs in my neighborhood bought one and I was peaking in on it. The General is definitely trying harder with interior and exterior design. I think it looks a bit awkward from some angles but stands out from the crowd. I'd have one over the Camry.

The new "taurus"/ "sable" sucks per Alan Mulally and Derrick Kuzak so no one in hell can vote for it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Clockwork
post Feb 8 2008, 05:25 PM
Post #17


Grease Monkey
**

Group: Members
Posts: 113
Joined: 6-December 07
Member No.: 4,170



I voted for the malibu, not just for the car itself but for the fact GM seems to be coming out of its drunken stooper and making cars that are actually visually appealing (Corvette excluded)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moe
post Feb 9 2008, 02:27 AM
Post #18


Posting God
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,365
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451
Car: '13 Toyota 86



^ Huh? The Malibu's visually appealing and the Corvette isn't?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slip
post Feb 10 2008, 03:38 PM
Post #19


gin & tonic
**

Group: Members
Posts: 436
Joined: 21-January 07
From: Charleston, SC
Member No.: 3,638
Car: 2002 Jaguar X-Type



went with the accord.

I honestly can't believe someone voted for the avenger
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr b00st
post Feb 10 2008, 11:57 PM
Post #20


That Frigging BMW Driver
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,727
Joined: 7-December 03
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 222
Car: 1997 BMW 328i



voted for the Accord, it's easily the best among them. Second would be the new Malbu, followed by Taurus/Sable, then Aura Green line, then the simply awful Dodge Avenger.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd November 2017 - 08:34 AM