Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Closed TopicStart new topic
> Acura RDX
Acura RDX
How cool is the Acura RDX?
Frozen [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Cool [ 6 ] ** [21.43%]
Uncool [ 15 ] ** [53.57%]
MJU [ 7 ] ** [25.00%]
Total Votes: 28
  
mung35
post Nov 2 2007, 10:59 PM
Post #1


PwnStar
***

Group: Members
Posts: 816
Joined: 17-March 07
From: California
Member No.: 3,752
Car: 2011 Mazda3s Grand Touring 6MT



Acura RDX

Engine: 2.3L Turbocharged
Transmission: 5-Speed Auto w/ Paddle Shifters
Horsepower: 240 @ 6000RPM
Torque: 260 lb-ft @ 4500RPM
Drivetrain: SH-AWD
Weight: 3924 lbs.
Seats: 5

In my opinion... the best thing in it's segment... drove one for fun... was REALLY impressed by it.
Your thoughts?








Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
clarkma5
post Nov 3 2007, 12:15 AM
Post #2


Talkin' the talk since 2003
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 28,271
Joined: 27-August 03
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 27
Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T



It's kinda ugly and it's also one of these endlessly boring and useless crossover SUVs that offer the utility of a wagon with the gas mileage of an SUV. Uncool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moe
post Nov 3 2007, 02:43 AM
Post #3


Posting God
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,365
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451
Car: '13 Toyota 86



The only thing really interesting about this car is the turbocharged engine. Otherwise it seems pretty boring inside and out. Also I remember the ad campaign was "Technocharged" where they boasted about its hi-tech um...iPod adapter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dr. Strangelove
post Nov 3 2007, 06:20 AM
Post #4


VTEC yo!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,503
Joined: 3-March 06
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 2,309
Car: 2007 Honda S2000



This is the coolest of the small crossover SUVs on the market. That being said, it's still a crossover SUV. Uncool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synesthesia
post Nov 3 2007, 07:00 AM
Post #5


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,455
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 2,585



I'm going with the flow. It defines uncool.

EDIT: IT HAS PADDLE SHIFTERS!? That's majorly uncool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moe
post Nov 3 2007, 11:09 AM
Post #6


Posting God
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,365
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451
Car: '13 Toyota 86



QUOTE(Synesthesia @ Nov 3 2007, 07:00 PM) *
EDIT: IT HAS PADDLE SHIFTERS!? That's majorly uncool.


What's wrong with that?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bing5500
post Nov 3 2007, 08:48 PM
Post #7


Lurking On Dubs
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,069
Joined: 31-May 04
Member No.: 795



It is an Acura...these days, for some unknown reason, that already puts it in "Uncool" territory for me (remember, the Cool Wall isn't necessarily rational). Then it is a crossover SUV that is ugly on the exterior and has boring styling on the inside...so it gets MJU from me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synesthesia
post Nov 3 2007, 10:06 PM
Post #8


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,455
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 2,585



QUOTE(moethepaki @ Nov 3 2007, 03:09 PM) *
What's wrong with that?


Give me one good reason this vehicle should have paddle shifters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moe
post Nov 4 2007, 11:44 AM
Post #9


Posting God
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,365
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451
Car: '13 Toyota 86



QUOTE(Synesthesia @ Nov 4 2007, 10:06 AM) *
Give me one good reason this vehicle should have paddle shifters.


The competition offers manual-mode shifting, why shouldn't Acura? It's also being marketed as a driver-focused SUV, like the X3, and paddle-shifters in the general publics mind = fun-to-drive. It's not a requirement, but I certainly wouldn't mind them being there in any car. My dad's Accord doesn't even have a tiptronic option, and God knows it would be cooler and a bit more fun with it.

Now give me one good reason why it shouldn't?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synesthesia
post Nov 4 2007, 05:54 PM
Post #10


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,455
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 2,585



QUOTE(moethepaki @ Nov 4 2007, 02:44 PM) *
The competition offers manual-mode shifting, why shouldn't Acura? It's also being marketed as a driver-focused SUV, like the X3, and paddle-shifters in the general publics mind = fun-to-drive. It's not a requirement, but I certainly wouldn't mind them being there in any car. My dad's Accord doesn't even have a tiptronic option, and God knows it would be cooler and a bit more fun with it.

Now give me one good reason why it shouldn't?


What is cool about a system which is only fun until you realize that the computers are not letting you do anything fun with it? I drove a Sonata with Triptronic and is was so irritating. It didn't let you rev high, or downshift aggressively. It was essentially a transmission that let you adjust how much slower than the automatic transmission you wanted to go. I guess it's more fun than auto in some sense, but certainly not cooler. It's actually much less cool. Where auto is boring but purposeful, semiauto is just extra money for something that'll make you "cooler" "trendier" and more "upper class". Paddles on an Accord? Come on. How asinine.


I guess maybe that was a shitty system I used, but regardless. The fact that the majority of people who buy semiauto think they're cool makes it uncool by definition.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mitlov
post Nov 4 2007, 06:00 PM
Post #11


Halfabusa lover
*****

Group: Banned
Posts: 5,339
Joined: 4-March 05
From: Ashland, OR
Member No.: 1,525



QUOTE(clarkma5 @ Nov 3 2007, 12:15 AM) *
It's kinda ugly and it's also one of these endlessly boring and useless crossover SUVs that offer the utility of a wagon with the gas mileage of an SUV. Uncool.


Nicely put. And let's not forget the slushbox-only factor. As for the X3, regardless of whether or not its manumatic paddles work well, you can get it with a stick and a clutch pedal, which will always be "cooler" than even the fastest-shifting and smoothest automatic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moe
post Nov 5 2007, 02:38 AM
Post #12


Posting God
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,365
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451
Car: '13 Toyota 86



QUOTE(Synesthesia @ Nov 5 2007, 05:54 AM) *
What is cool about a system which is only fun until you realize that the computers are not letting you do anything fun with it? I drove a Sonata with Triptronic and is was so irritating. It didn't let you rev high, or downshift aggressively. It was essentially a transmission that let you adjust how much slower than the automatic transmission you wanted to go. I guess it's more fun than auto in some sense, but certainly not cooler. It's actually much less cool. Where auto is boring but purposeful, semiauto is just extra money for something that'll make you "cooler" "trendier" and more "upper class". Paddles on an Accord? Come on. How asinine.
I guess maybe that was a shitty system I used, but regardless. The fact that the majority of people who buy semiauto think they're cool makes it uncool by definition.


If I'm going to be stuck driving an auto, I might as well have paddle shifters, they add a "sense" of fun, rather than just leaving it in D. I dunno, maybe I've just been lucky, I've never encountered a tiptronic system that reduced the fun-factor. Not everything has to be hardcore racing, and has to make the car go faster to be fun. I just think it's cool flicking levers or pushing buttons to change gear, even if it isn't doing anything productive. If you don't like it, just leave it in D.

Also not that many people are charging extra money for semi-auto. Last time I checked almost every car that has an auto comes with a tiptronic mode as well. The time when it was a novelty feature has pretty much gone.

And how is wanting tiptronic on an Accord asinine? It's an opinion. When my dad's too tired to drive, and I'm stuck driving one of the most boring cars on the planet...I really, really wouldn't mind a tiptronic. The Mazda 6, Nissan Altima, and a bunch of other family sedans have them, why not the Accord.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
infinity
post Nov 5 2007, 09:29 AM
Post #13


ZoomZoom
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,089
Joined: 21-February 06
From: Durham, NC
Member No.: 2,281
Car: 2011 Mazdaspeed 3



Its not nearly as "cool" as the MDX (not that its a particularly cool vehicle) but its not really "uncool" either. Its just sort of...there. Not really cool or uncool. I wouldn't call it uncool though so I guess I'll give it a cool. If there was an "average" or "just there" choice, I'd select it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn
post Nov 5 2007, 03:32 PM
Post #14


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,587
Joined: 2-October 07
From: Canada
Member No.: 4,080
Car: 2009 Subaru Legacy



^I agree with the "just there" comment...if it were not for the fact that every one of these I see is being driven by a yuppie with a backwards hat, trying desperately to hold on to their youth while trying to do their best Jenson Button impression I would never notice them.

The only redeeming feature is the fact that it's turbocharged, I don't know why, but there is something attractive about a turbocharged Honda.

Still uncool though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GTR
post Nov 5 2007, 03:38 PM
Post #15


The Ultimate Driving Machine
**

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 12-May 07
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Member No.: 3,864



the RDX hasn't really impacted me in such a way.
I think the new MDX looks better than this one too.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synesthesia
post Nov 5 2007, 08:07 PM
Post #16


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,455
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 2,585



QUOTE(Bjorn @ Nov 5 2007, 06:32 PM) *
^I agree with the "just there" comment...if it were not for the fact that every one of these I see is being driven by a yuppie with a backwards hat, trying desperately to hold on to their youth while trying to do their best Jenson Button impression I would never notice them.

The only redeeming feature is the fact that it's turbocharged, I don't know why, but there is something attractive about a turbocharged Honda.

Still uncool though.


That makes me wonder, how good is this engine? Has anyone done anything interesting with it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moe
post Nov 5 2007, 11:38 PM
Post #17


Posting God
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,365
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451
Car: '13 Toyota 86



QUOTE(Synesthesia @ Nov 6 2007, 08:07 AM) *
Has anyone done anything interesting with it?


Yeah, I had buttsechs with it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synesthesia
post Nov 6 2007, 05:52 AM
Post #18


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,455
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 2,585



QUOTE(moethepaki @ Nov 6 2007, 02:38 AM) *
Yeah, I had buttsechs with it.


rolleyes.gif I meant like dropping it in a lighter car and upping the power.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr b00st
post Nov 17 2007, 02:55 PM
Post #19


That Frigging BMW Driver
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,727
Joined: 7-December 03
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 222
Car: 1997 BMW 328i



the fun to drive qoutient (and it is... what a great motor!) is offset by it being ugly, stupid, pointless, and pretty much useless as an SUV. So it's uncool. nice interior and drivetrain, but why isn't that engine and drivetrain in the fucking TSX?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd September 2017 - 08:54 PM