Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Closed TopicStart new topic
> PGO Cevennes
PGO Cevennes
What do you think?
Sub Zero [ 1 ] ** [3.85%]
Pretty damned cold [ 3 ] ** [11.54%]
Uninspired Porsche-clone [ 13 ] ** [50.00%]
MJU [ 9 ] ** [34.62%]
Total Votes: 26
post Oct 2 2007, 12:18 PM
Post #1

Posting God

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,366
Joined: 30-January 05
From: Dubai
Member No.: 1,451

Engine: In-line four-cyl, 1997cc, 16v

Max power: 137bhp @ 6000rpm

Max torque: 140lb ft @ 4100rpm

0 - 60mph: 7.0sec (est)

Top Speed: 125mph (est)

Price: £29,995

It’s no surprise to learn that most of the enquiries about the PGO Cévennes have come from Mini owners. It is, after all, another modern interpretation of an iconic motor, and a pretty one at that. Like the Mini, it’s chunkier than its inspiration, but maintains the essence and charm without looking awkward or overly contrived.

I doubt you’ll have heard of PGO (we hadn’t), despite the fact that it’s been around for some 27 years and has been building the Cévennes since 2005. Porsche has heard of them, though – it attempted to sue the tiny French manufacturer for plundering its heritage. But PGO won on appeal and now Ascot-based Lifestyle Automotive has begun importing the Cévennes into the UK.

So what is it? Being the product of a French company, all the running gear is PSA-sourced, starting with the engine from the Peugeot 206 GTI. With just 137bhp from 2 litres it was hardly a rip-snorter even when it was new (and to be honest the 206 never really floated the evo boat either) but here it’s mounted amidships, driving the rear wheels, and there’s less weight to motivate (980kg plays 1125kg).

Performance is spirited rather than wildly rapid and the motor needs to be spinning at the top end of the rev range to give its best, which in itself isn’t a problem. It’s just a shame that it’s so quiet: you hope for a rorty rasp but all you get is a boringly muted humdrum thrum. The steering is only so-so, too: like the 206’s it’s light, lacks detail and is a little slow-witted – a combination that’d usually have us dismissing the PGO outright.

The Cévennes’ chassis recovers the situation, however. It’s obvious from the moment you pull away that the whole car has been well engineered. The fit and finish are first rate, there are no shakes, shimmies or rattles, and it feels at least as good as a product from a major manufacturer. More to the point, it rides beautifully and yet corners hard and fast with minimal body roll. It hangs on well through the bends, keying into the tarmac and slingshotting out with little fuss or wasted effort. It could certainly handle a lot more fire in its belly. As it stands, exceeding the available grip requires determination and, even when you do, it won’t catch you out – the chassis relays the information that the steering lacks and it’s surprisingly friendly for a mid-engined car.

Overall, then, a frustratingly missed opportunity. PGO has got all the hard bits right: everything it has designed, engineered and bolted together is on the money, but it’s let down by the PSA underpinnings. If you’re looking for something to cruise around the countryside in, this is fine, but we’d like to have the power and steering the chassis deserves.

Source: Evo

I give it a frozen on looks alone.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Oct 2 2007, 12:34 PM
Post #2


Group: Members
Posts: 3,089
Joined: 21-February 06
From: Durham, NC
Member No.: 2,281
Car: 2011 Mazdaspeed 3

Looks like a Porsche, only ugly.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Oct 2 2007, 02:53 PM
Post #3

Latent racecar driver

Group: Members
Posts: 1,337
Joined: 31-January 05
From: So-Cal
Member No.: 1,455
Car: 2006 Slobalt, '65 Karmann Ghia

It looks almost like it wants to be a Karman ghia and becuase it isn't and cant be one it is uncool. It's also ugly.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Oct 2 2007, 07:31 PM
Post #4

Talkin' the talk since 2003

Group: Admin
Posts: 28,271
Joined: 27-August 03
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 27
Car: 2004 VW GTI 1.8T

It's like Proton got their hands on a classic (the 356) design-wise. Then it got stuffed full of mediocre economy car components. Cool concept, but very poor in terms of execution. Uncool.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Oct 4 2007, 10:21 PM
Post #5


Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,251
Joined: 13-November 03
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 166
Car: 2006 Subaru WRX STI

its a 356 with downs syndrome!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Oct 5 2007, 10:54 AM
Post #6

Pit Mechanic

Group: Members
Posts: 1,584
Joined: 13-February 05
From: Germany
Member No.: 1,485
Car: Caterham Seven

Warm as a freshly produced heap of cow dung.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Oct 6 2007, 05:32 AM
Post #7

Race Driver

Group: Members
Posts: 4,455
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 2,585

What a freakin' weird looking car. I say it's MJU not only because it's trying to be a 365 but because it majorly fails at it.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mr b00st
post Nov 17 2007, 02:56 PM
Post #8

That Frigging BMW Driver

Group: Members
Posts: 6,727
Joined: 7-December 03
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 222
Car: 1997 BMW 328i

too much moneyz/ not enough power.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Closed TopicStart new topic


RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th July 2020 - 03:11 PM
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here