Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Closed TopicStart new topic
> 1964 Chrysler Corporation's Turbine Car, Yeah you heard me right.....
1964 Chrysler Corporation's Turbine Car
1964 Chrysler Corporation's Turbine Car
Frozen [ 3 ] ** [11.11%]
Cool [ 14 ] ** [51.85%]
Uncool [ 4 ] ** [14.81%]
Your Grandfather's Sense of Fashion Uncool [ 6 ] ** [22.22%]
Total Votes: 27
  
Jekyll_2005
post Mar 29 2005, 05:54 PM
Post #1


Grease Monkey
**

Group: Members
Posts: 254
Joined: 20-October 03
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Member No.: 131



Chrysler Corporation's Turbine Car of 1963 was the culmination of years of research and development in alternative engine design. The idea was to produce a power plant that would run on many fuels, have fewer moving parts, while still giving adequate performance and economy for passenger car use.

http://www.lhmopars.com/MOPAR_Ads/Turbine_Cover.jpg

Chrysler engineers had been testing turbine technology in passenger cars since the mid 1950's. The first car to be equipped with a turbine engine was a 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. This "first generation" turbine design produced 100 horsepower and suffered from poor acceleration and fuel economy. As research continued, Chrysler developed a "second generation" turbine that was put to test in 1959. This engine produced 200 horsepower and was built from new materials that proved vastly superior to the previous design. A more refined version of the engine was installed in a 1960 Plymouth, a 2 1/2 ton Dodge truck, and the TurboFlite show car that was designed by Maury Baldwin. A major advancement came in 1962, with the introduction of the CR2A turbine engine. The CR2A made vast improvements in performance and engine braking by incorporating a variable angle fuel nozzle. The CR2A could go from idle to full output in 1.5-2 seconds, as compared with earlier turbines that took 7 seconds to reach full output. After the many advances in turbine engine technology, Chrysler put together plans to produce a limited number of unique cars that would feature the turbine power plant. These cars would not be adaptations of a current production vehicle, but a new design styled and built around the turbine engine.



Chrysler decided to produce fifty of the Turbine Cars and release them to public through a test program. The cars were fabricated by the Italian coachbuilder Ghia, who had been building Chrysler's limousines and show cars for a number of years. The cars were shipped back to the U.S., where they would be distributed to participants of the test program. The participants were selected from a list of over 30,000 applicants that Chrysler had collected. Each car would be driven by a program participant for several months, then passed on. By the end of the test program in 1966, 203 people in 48 states had driven the Turbine Cars.

http://www.imperialclub.com/Articles/Turbi...eCA/Page8-9.jpg

Unfortunately, as the test program ended, the results were not as favorable as Chrysler had hoped. Fuel economy was not as good as Chrysler hoped for a production car. People diskliked the acceleration lag of the turbine as compared to conventional piston engines. To the credit of the Turbine Car, people were impressed with the design and features of the car and with its smooth, vibration free ride. Another point in favor of the Turbine, was that the engine required very little maintenance as compared to conventional engines.

The saddest portion of the Turbine Car story is that forty of the cars had to be destroyed to save Chrysler from paying hefty import duties on the Italian built cars. Most of the ten that remain are in the care of private collectors or museums. Two of the Turbine Cars were kept by Chrysler and one is on display in the Chrysler Museum.



Turbine Engine Production
CR1 54-56 Plymouth Belvedere 4-door ~100 HP Poor fuel economy (13-14 MPG) No engine braking Slow spool up
CR2 56-57 56 Belvedere, 57 Fury Better regenerator Better fuel economy (18 MPG)
CR2A 60-61 60 Fury, 62 Fury(2), 62 Dart(2) 61 Dodge 2 1/2 ton stake Turboflite show car. 140 HP, 375lb-ft, adjustable nozzle blades
A831 63-66 63 Turbine Cars (50) 130 HP, 425 lb-ft much less lag.
A874 64 64 Plymouth(2) Same as A831 but with larger regenerators.
Gen6 64-73 Prototype Charger, 66 Coronet 73 B-Body sedans(3) Same as A875 but with split accessory drive.
Gen7 77 76 4-door Aspen, Concept F-body 80 Mirada 104 HP (could be raised to 125)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phix
post Mar 29 2005, 06:17 PM
Post #2


Banned
******

Group: Members
Posts: 11,268
Joined: 6-December 04
From: Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 1,208
Car: N/A



Isn't this a one-off of sorts?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jekyll_2005
post Mar 29 2005, 06:20 PM
Post #3


Grease Monkey
**

Group: Members
Posts: 254
Joined: 20-October 03
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Member No.: 131



i guess you could say that it was, but they did make this car, but then demolished them, and like it said, somthing like 200 people test drove the car, so i don tknow what you would call it, but the strange part is, it that it did see the asphault and was actually used by people, so im confused.......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raven
post Mar 30 2005, 08:07 AM
Post #4


Hyper Speeder
**

Group: Members
Posts: 332
Joined: 25-March 05
From: Europe
Member No.: 1,575



The headlights are ugly! sick.gif

The rear is kind of weird. huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jekyll_2005
post Mar 30 2005, 09:01 AM
Post #5


Grease Monkey
**

Group: Members
Posts: 254
Joined: 20-October 03
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Member No.: 131



QUOTE(Raven @ Mar 30 2005, 08:07 AM)
The headlights are ugly! sick.gif

The rear is kind of weird. huh.gif

it is from the 60's, what do you expect
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Boxster17
post Mar 30 2005, 09:20 AM
Post #6


...lurking...
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,175
Joined: 19-August 04
From: Westfield, NJ
Member No.: 999



I think it's cool, just because it's so different from anything else on the road.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Halflifehavock13
post Mar 30 2005, 08:53 PM
Post #7


Marginal Contributions
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,329
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 1,555



it looks kinda dorky.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Viper007Bond
post Mar 30 2005, 08:59 PM
Post #8


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,852
Joined: 2-October 03
From: Portland, Oregon, USA
Member No.: 101



Love it, but once again, that's not the purpose of the cool wall. I vote seriously uncool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RallyCat909
post Dec 19 2005, 06:56 PM
Post #9


Pit Mechanic
***

Group: Members
Posts: 768
Joined: 31-July 04
Member No.: 963



I actually saw this car in the St Louis museum of transportation and the curator told me that it was OPEC that saw to the death of this car, not Chrysler. They had planned to run the car in limited production, and the engines were being looked into for extensive future development, but as soon as OPEC found out about the threat that the engine gave them, they lobbied against this sort of engine from the angle that the high rpms would result in noise and the car would be a public nusiance. Waht scared them was that these engines can burn anything flammable (hairspray, gas, diesel, etc.) effciently, that would have been a thorn in the side to OPEC profits.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DakianDelomast
post Dec 20 2005, 10:04 AM
Post #10


I will stand, or I will fall. But I will not sit.
******

Group: Members
Posts: 13,576
Joined: 4-September 03
From: Somewhere between Chicago and Indianapolis
Member No.: 58
Car: Miata & RX-7



Well lets not forget the exhausts that will melt cars behind you as well.

The turbine engine has a lot of flaws to it, gas consumption being a HUGE one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tune
post Dec 21 2005, 05:37 AM
Post #11


Lighting Consultant
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,668
Joined: 18-April 04
From: England
Member No.: 719
Car: '07 Fiat Bravo



Crazy cool, love the headlights makes it look like a hammer head shark!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd October 2020 - 11:54 PM
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here