Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Closed TopicStart new topic
> Chevrolet Camaro, 1993-2002 V8s only
On the scale of cool...
On the scale of cool...
Hypercool [ 10 ] ** [13.51%]
Cool [ 15 ] ** [20.27%]
psuedocool [ 23 ] ** [31.08%]
anticool [ 26 ] ** [35.14%]
Total Votes: 74
  
midnightdorifto
post Feb 4 2006, 12:59 AM
Post #41


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,510
Joined: 10-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 1,037



QUOTE(Cyclone @ Feb 3 2006, 03:53 AM) *
If I actually liked you, I'd hall of fame this. But your insult to grande mocha foam-free lattes is just way out of line. You asshole ~cries in a corner~ cry.gif cry.gif

*emo tear* for not being in the Hall of Fame.

<--apologizes, not a coffee drinker. I seek other means of delivering caffiene.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Blue Devil
post Jan 11 2007, 11:34 AM
Post #42


Anda a freir monos en la sarten de palos.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,640
Joined: 9-January 07
From: Miami, FL
Member No.: 3,612
Car: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS IBM



QUOTE(bing5500 @ Jan 3 2006, 09:21 PM) *
The cool wall isn't just about specs but also the culture & image of a car so the Camaro just screams "disgustingly uncool". The first thing that pops in my head when someone says "Camaro" is "mullet"...I imagine someone playing Poison or Whitesnake while doing burnouts in the Wal-Mart parking lot. Nothing that comes to mind about the Camaro is fond for me...

BTW, before someone swears that the above is just exaggerated legend, I just have to say that I grew up in the country and I have seen more then my fair share of hicks in Camaros growing up.

Depends on where you live I guess. Camaros around here (miami) are driven by non mullet individuals.. just regular people looking for a FAST as hell car that handles well and can keep up and beat anything in it's category... and then some.

QUOTE(midnightdorifto @ Jan 30 2006, 10:10 PM) *
You bet. They're worthless pieces of domestic trash. They have terrible ergonomics, and they're not made with the finest alacantra and leather. The plastics are terrible. And they have horrible cup holders, they always spill my double grande mocha foam-free latte on my way to the Socialist Club meetings. And mine only gets 28mpg. Hell, they're just pieces of shit.
P.S. Camaro owners prefer Iron Maiden.

No... they are not made with the finest alacantra and leather... because that's NOT what they are for. These cars in their time where the BANG-FOR-THE-BUCK car as performance wise comes. Pulling low 13's in the 1/4 mile stock.. and handled great in the road course.. if you know how to push it. And they spilled all the coffee cause they would PULL so hard!!!

QUOTE(DZ302 @ Jan 31 2006, 03:36 PM) *
yeah, damn they need to get with the times. they should have switched over to overhead cams a long time ago. i mean, ever since nissan invented the ohc engine with the skyline, everybody has seen how ultra high tech and newage it is.


The overhead cams are all nice and fancy... but Chevy and it's dinosaour small block is pulling the best HP numbers and gas mileage. All from the old push-rod... we ARE still using the old push-rod on the new Z06.. the only car on the 500 hp range.. withouth the Gas-Guzzler tax...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Halflifehavock13
post Jan 11 2007, 12:14 PM
Post #43


Marginal Contributions
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,329
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 1,555



QUOTE(Blue Devil @ Jan 11 2007, 02:34 PM) *
Depends on where you live I guess. Camaros around here (miami) are driven by non mullet individuals.. just regular people looking for a FAST as hell car that handles well and can keep up and beat anything in it's category... and then some.

I agree with the 'bang for the buck' part but they don't handle well. With modifications, you can make them. But stock, no.

Edit: And the z06 gets good mileage not because of the engine, but the extremely long overdrive sixth gear.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
leif
post Jan 11 2007, 01:30 PM
Post #44


Scientist, Racecar driver, Hero
****

Group: Banned
Posts: 4,106
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Winnipeg Canada
Member No.: 1,332
Car: 2001 Subaru Legacy



^If I remember correctly what PBB told me, I think its skip shift feature also factors into its EPA figures.

Not to say I don't like the Z06...I do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Halflifehavock13
post Jan 11 2007, 01:54 PM
Post #45


Marginal Contributions
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,329
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 1,555



QUOTE(leif @ Jan 11 2007, 04:30 PM) *
^If I remember correctly what PBB told me, I think its skip shift feature also factors into its EPA figures.

Not to say I don't like the Z06...I do.

Skip shift? Are you talking about the automatic in the regular C6? Or just the ability to skip gears while using a stick in the z06?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DakianDelomast
post Jan 11 2007, 03:04 PM
Post #46


I will stand, or I will fall. But I will not sit.
******

Group: Members
Posts: 13,576
Joined: 4-September 03
From: Somewhere between Chicago and Indianapolis
Member No.: 58
Car: Miata & RX-7



QUOTE(Halflifehavock13 @ Jan 11 2007, 04:54 PM) *
Skip shift? Are you talking about the automatic in the regular C6? Or just the ability to skip gears while using a stick in the z06?


Its not an ability, more like an invasive lockout that is disabled by most owners. In a manual GM LS powered vehicle if certain conditions aren't met, the transmission will NOT let you shift into 2nd or 3rd.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dukenukem
post Jan 11 2007, 03:36 PM
Post #47


**Snuggles**
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,251
Joined: 13-November 03
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 166
Car: 2006 Subaru WRX STI



QUOTE(Blue Devil @ Jan 11 2007, 01:34 PM) *
No... they are not made with the finest alacantra and leather... because that's NOT what they are for. These cars in their time where the BANG-FOR-THE-BUCK car as performance wise comes. Pulling low 13's in the 1/4 mile stock.. and handled great in the road course.. if you know how to push it. And they spilled all the coffee cause they would PULL so hard!!!

midnight was being sarcastic there .... he drives a camaro mullet edition.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Halflifehavock13
post Jan 11 2007, 06:14 PM
Post #48


Marginal Contributions
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,329
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 1,555



QUOTE(DakianDelomast @ Jan 11 2007, 06:04 PM) *
Its not an ability, more like an invasive lockout that is disabled by most owners. In a manual GM LS powered vehicle if certain conditions aren't met, the transmission will NOT let you shift into 2nd or 3rd.

Ah. But I don't think that would affect highway mileage that much because you will usually spend most of your time in one gear. Aren't Corvettes exempt from the gas guzzler tax because of their good highway epa mileage? (about 28 for the manual ls2, 27 for the automatic, and 26 for the z06)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dukenukem
post Jan 12 2007, 07:19 AM
Post #49


**Snuggles**
******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,251
Joined: 13-November 03
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 166
Car: 2006 Subaru WRX STI



QUOTE(Halflifehavock13 @ Jan 11 2007, 08:14 PM) *
Ah. But I don't think that would affect highway mileage that much because you will usually spend most of your time in one gear. Aren't Corvettes exempt from the gas guzzler tax because of their good highway epa mileage? (about 28 for the manual ls2, 27 for the automatic, and 26 for the z06)

Tall gearing and that lockout BS are some of the reasons for such superior gas mileage happy2.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
leif
post Jan 12 2007, 07:19 AM
Post #50


Scientist, Racecar driver, Hero
****

Group: Banned
Posts: 4,106
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Winnipeg Canada
Member No.: 1,332
Car: 2001 Subaru Legacy



I think PBB told me it accounts for about 10%...but I would need to ask him again to be sure.

And I'm fairly sure the EPA figures are derived from a Duty cycle, rather than staying in one gear for a long time. There has been some call for the EPA to update their "duty cycle", if they haven't done so already.

If I'm not mistaken the current duty cycle was designed in the 1970's, and the primary criticism against it is that a commute now has much more start and stop driving conditions than before, making the current test cycle less relevant to the typical consumer.


If the EPA were to update their duty cycle however, I'm sure the figures for most vehicles would be negatively affected.

EDIT: I just found this:

QUOTE
Due to concerns over the accuracy of this method, a new test was proposed and approved in 2006 for use beginning with model year 2008 vehicles[5]. This new test no longer relies on the fixed global correction factors that the old test used; each vehicle is tested through conditions that more accurately model modern driving, and uses vehicle-specific data. The fuel economy ratings for vehicles tested under the new system are expected to drop an average of 12 percent on 'city' mileage, and 8 percent on 'highway' mileage.


The article went on to say that hybrid vehicles will be negatively affected by up to 30% by the new standards...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PBB
post Jan 12 2007, 09:19 AM
Post #51


Aeternum vale
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,810
Joined: 6-March 04
Member No.: 636



GM's skipshift is known officially as "Computer aided gear selection" (CAGS.) It consists of a solenoid on the T-56 transmission that locks out 2nd and 3rd gear under the following conditions:
  • Engine coolant is 170 F or higher
  • Speed between 15 and 20 MPH
  • Throttle between 0 and 25%
During the lockout, a dashboard light that says "SKIP SHIFT" is illuminated and you have to shift from 1st directly to 4th. There is no timeout; that is, the lockout continues as long as the above conditions persist.

The entire purpose of skipshift is to avoid the gas guzzler tax, it's just a little trick to bump the fuel economy up above 22.5 MPG. Not sure on the exact MPG improvement under testing, but it is fairly signicant.

Of course, skipshift is annoying as fuck all but it's really easy to disable. On OBD-I cars (Prior to 1996), disabably it was as simple as unplugging the wire for the solenoid. On OBD-II cars, just unplugging the solenoid will throw the SES (service engine soon) light for emissions. A 24 ohm resistor spliced into the end of the wire to simulate the electrical load of the solenoid is all that's required. Quite a few companies sell a kit with the resistor that just clips inbetween the solenoid and the harness lead, pictured below.

All in all, skipshift is a just a way for LSx owners to pay $25 to avoid $1000-2000 in bullshit taxes.



QUOTE(leif @ Jan 12 2007, 10:19 AM) *
And I'm fairly sure the EPA figures are derived from a Duty cycle, rather than staying in one gear for a long time. There has been some call for the EPA to update their "duty cycle", if they haven't done so already.

The mileage figure used to compute if a car is eligible for the gas gizzler tax is combined, 55% city, 45% highway. Skipshift works real well under testing to bump the fuel economy in the stop-and-go city portion of the test while the really tall overdrive gearing does wonders on the highway section.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DakianDelomast
post Jan 12 2007, 10:25 AM
Post #52


I will stand, or I will fall. But I will not sit.
******

Group: Members
Posts: 13,576
Joined: 4-September 03
From: Somewhere between Chicago and Indianapolis
Member No.: 58
Car: Miata & RX-7



But the point is that the pushrod LS engine isn't a magical fairy creation that's capable of pure magic. An engine is an engine is an engine is an engine and large displacement burns more fuel. Its just the gears are used to compensate for that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PBB
post Jan 12 2007, 11:04 AM
Post #53


Aeternum vale
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,810
Joined: 6-March 04
Member No.: 636



QUOTE(DakianDelomast @ Jan 12 2007, 01:25 PM) *
But the point is that the pushrod LS engine isn't a magical fairy creation that's capable of pure magic.

You're precisely correct. The LSx was made by the hand of God himself. Raspberry.gif

Interesting tidbit about how long the gearing is in the T-56: if there was no wind resistance and the tires could handle the rolling resistance, a bone stock C6 Corvette Z06 would go 284 mph at redline in 6th gear. Sixth gear is strictly an overdrive gear. Fifth gear is good for 228 mph which is why the Corvette, Camaro, Viper and Ford GT and similar big engine, long gearing sports cars do their top speed in 5th.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ss670
post Jan 13 2007, 10:40 AM
Post #54


Dirty Oil Filter


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 13-January 07
Member No.: 3,623



Here's the original page PBB cribbed his !CAGS information from (oops!):
QUOTE
Computer aided gear selection (CAGS) is a hack that was invented to avoid the gas guzzler tax. A solenoid is used to lock out second and third gears when the following conditions are met:
  • Engine coolant is 170 F or higher
  • Speed between 15 and 20 MPH
  • Throttle between 0 and 25%
During the lockout, a dashboard light that says "SKIP SHIFT" is illuminated and you are supposed to shift from 1st directly to 4th. There is apparently no timeout; that is, the lockout continues as long as the above conditions persist.

The good news is that it's easy to defeat CAGS. Prior to 1996 when OBD-II went into effect, one could simply unplug the CAGS solenoid connector. However, OBD-II is required to detect failures that impact emissions, so disconnecting the CAGS solenoid on a 1996 or newer T56 transmission car will cause a service emissions system (SES) warning light. A number of companies (including Chevrolet) sell !CAGS kits. The kit consists of a connector with a 24 ohm resistor potted in it that simulates the electrical load of the solenoid.

I installed a !CAGS rig the day after I picked up SS #670. (This let me have a little taste of how annoying it could be.) I bought it nearly two months before I place my order for the car!

Later I disabled CAGS with EFILive's FlashScan programming tool.

I think CAGS was an elegant solution to the gas guzzler tax. I'd much rather install a $25 part than pay a $2K tax to the IRS.
The original version (with picture) can be found here: SS #670 Modifications: Disable CAGS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
midnightdorifto
post Jan 14 2007, 04:38 PM
Post #55


Race Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,510
Joined: 10-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 1,037



QUOTE(DakianDelomast @ Jan 11 2007, 03:04 PM) *
Its not an ability, more like an invasive lockout that is disabled by most owners. In a manual GM LS powered vehicle if certain conditions aren't met, the transmission will NOT let you shift into 2nd or 3rd.

It is NOT that invasive. You've really got to try to get it to come on in the C6 Z06.

QUOTE(PBB @ Jan 12 2007, 11:04 AM) *
You're precisely correct. The LSx was made by the hand of God himself. Raspberry.gif

Interesting tidbit about how long the gearing is in the T-56: if there was no wind resistance and the tires could handle the rolling resistance, a bone stock C6 Corvette Z06 would go 284 mph at redline in 6th gear. Sixth gear is strictly an overdrive gear. Fifth gear is good for 228 mph which is why the Corvette, Camaro, Viper and Ford GT and similar big engine, long gearing sports cars do their top speed in 5th.

gas_milage++
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DakianDelomast
post Jan 15 2007, 10:23 PM
Post #56


I will stand, or I will fall. But I will not sit.
******

Group: Members
Posts: 13,576
Joined: 4-September 03
From: Somewhere between Chicago and Indianapolis
Member No.: 58
Car: Miata & RX-7



That's the Z06, every F-Body I've ever been in makes me want to stab the car with a blunt object.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd November 2017 - 11:38 PM